DESENHAR, INTERAGIR, COMPREENDER

O DIAGRAMA COMO PERFORMANCE: INSCRIÇÃO, MÉTODO E RACIONALIDADE

Authors

  • Thiago Costa Instituto Federal do Mato Grosso - IFMT, Pontes e Lacerda/MT, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-8418
  • Ariadne Marinho Secretaria de Educação - SEDUC/MT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19179/rdf.v65i65.1565

Keywords:

Imagem, diagrama, Representações epistêmicas, Arte, Ciência

Abstract

A diagram consists of a set of lines and other geometric shapes. From their particular entanglement on a planispheric surface comes a graphic inscription. It is therefore an image. It consists of a unique category of visual transcription, manual operation and intellectual agency; therefore, a visual artifact of unequivocal cognitive, pedagogical and epistemic appeal. By combining different languages and different types of knowledge in a mestizo and transdisciplinary figuration, the diagram establishes other ways of apprehending and interacting with the data of reality. It thus contributes both to the systematization of an abstract judgment and to its assimilation and understanding. The diagram, therefore, is a fabric. Mobile, dynamic, flexible. Just like thought. It is activity, adjustment and recording. It condenses in itself the empirical concreteness of an action, the creation of an object - the image, the scheme - with the immateriality of a projective, suppositional, prognostic reasoning. In our paper - based on the considerations of John Bender and Michael Marrinan, in "The Culture of Diagram" (2010) - we provide some of the definitions of the diagram, usually situated between art and science, emphasizing its multidimensional character, that is, not only as a) individual visual annotation but as b) methodological procedure, supported and guided by a c) particular model of rationality.

Keywords: diagrams, images, epistemic representations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Thiago Costa, Instituto Federal do Mato Grosso - IFMT, Pontes e Lacerda/MT, Brasil

Thiago Costa é historiador. Graduado e Mestre em História pela UFMT (2008 e 2011) e Doutor em Estética e História da Arte pela USP (2023). É docente do IFMT - campus Fronteira Oeste/Pontes e Lacerda. Seus temas de interesse abrangem Teoria da Imagem, História da Arte, História da Cultura, História da Ciência, História da Física, História da Biologia, Filosofia da História, Filosofia da Física e Filosofia da Biologia.

Ariadne Marinho , Secretaria de Educação - SEDUC/MT

Ariadne Marinho é historiadora. Doutora em História pela UFMT e docente da Rede Estadual de Educação de Mato Grosso. Seus temas de interesse abrangem história da doença, lepra/hanseníase, biopoder, feminismos, memória de velhos.

References

BARCELÓ, Axel Arturo. “Las imágenes como herramientas epistémicas”. SCIENTIAE Studia. São Paulo, volume 14, n. 1, 2016; pp. 45-63.

BENDER, John and MARRINAN, Michael. The Culture of Diagram. Stanford: Stanford University. Press, 2010.

EVEN-EZRA, Ayelet. “Introduction”. In: __________. Lines of Thought. Branching Diagrams and the Medieval Mind. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London, 2021.

GESTEIRA, Heloísa Meireles. “Descrições da América: Historia Natural, circulação de ideias e a formação territorial do Brasil (séculos XVI ao XVIII). Revista Intellèctus. Ano XIII, nº 2, 2014; pp. 1-30.

INGOLD, Tim. Lines: a brief history. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.

LEASK, Nigel. Curiosity and the aesthetics of travel writing, 1770-1840. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2008 [2002].

MASSIRONI, Manfredo. Ver pelo desenho: aspectos técnicos, cognitivos, comunicativos. Tradução de Cidália de Brito – Lisboa: Edições 70, 2015 [1982].

NETZ, Reviel. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

PARRA VALENCIA, Juan Diego. “Imagen, virtualidade y heterotopía. Reflexiones acerca de la imagen y su función heterotópica”. Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 17(32), 2017; pp. 229-244.

PIMENTEL, Juan. “Cuadros y escrituras de la naturaleza”. Asclepio, vol. LVI-2, 2004; pp. 7-23.

PRIEST, Greg; DE TOFFOLI, Silvia; FINDLEN, Paula. “Tools of Reason: the practice of scientific diagramming from Antiquity to the Present”. Endeavour, 42, 2018; pp. 49-59.

SÁNCHEZ, Antonio. “Ciencia moderna, cultura visual e epistemologia artesanal”. Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia, vol. LXI, 2009; pp. 259-274.

SCHNEIDER, Birgit. “Diagramatics”. In: BREDEKAMP, Horst; DÜNKEL, Vera; SCHNEIDER, Birgit (eds). The Technical Image. A history of styles in scientific imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015; pp. 152-156.

TAMBORINI, Marco. “‘From the Unknown to the Known and Backwards’: Representing and Presenting Remote Time in Nineteenth-Century Palaeontology”. In: BAUMBACH, Sibylle et al. (eds.). The Fascination with Unknown Time. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2017; pp. 115-140.

VELLODI, Kamini. “Diagram: Deleuze’s augmentation of a topical notion”. Word & Image, 34;4,2018; pp. 299-309.

VOSS, Julia. Darwin’s Pictures. Views of Evolutionary Theory, 1837–1874. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010 [2007].

Published

09/09/2025

How to Cite

Costa, T., & Marinho , A. (2025). DESENHAR, INTERAGIR, COMPREENDER: O DIAGRAMA COMO PERFORMANCE: INSCRIÇÃO, MÉTODO E RACIONALIDADE. Revista Da FUNDARTE, 65(65), e1565. https://doi.org/10.19179/rdf.v65i65.1565